Skip to main content

Is English killing other languages?

Powerful languages, like nations, thrive on the weakness of other languages. So when it comes to the question of whether or not English is killing other languages, the answer, plain and short, is Yes, it's killing other languages in the same way that every language associated with a nation-state kills other minority languages.

French is killing/killed Breton, Alsatian, Proven├žal and all the other minority Languages of France.

Thai is killing Hmong, Akha, Kuuki Thaadow and other minority Category: Languages of Thailand.

Russian killed many Uralic and Eskimo-Aleut languages and attempted to kill many of the Turkic languages, like Uzbek and Kazakh, and Caucasian language like Georgian. But the breakup of the USSR and the renationalization of those countries have potentially spared many of them.

And who knows how many languages Mandarin Chinese is killing right now. God only knows! 

And so by the same token, English is killing or has killed hundreds of Languages of the United States, including many of the languages in the  Algonquian, Iroquoian and Athabaskan families, to name but a few. 

Also, in the UK and Ireland, English has killed or come close to killing Celtic, Gaelic and so on. And in Australia, English has killed many Australian aboriginal languages.

So, ultimately, languages associated with a nation-state will kill the other minority languages as a function of:

  • nationalized schools, where success is determined by knowing the dominant language.
  • centralized government, where knowing the dominant language is crucial to finding a job.
  • social pressure to fit in.
  • urban migration, removing many of the barriers to assimilation.
...and other factors.

It worth noting that a number of countries and organizations have tried to avoid this state of affairs. India recognizes several dozen languages in its constitution, which is an important step forward. Australia and New Zealand have been making efforts to support Maori languages. Universities and organizations in the US, such as Breath of Life Archival Institute for Indigenous Languages are attempting to help Native American tribes maintain their languages.

The other answers to this question are suggesting other effects of encroaching English, however, and that, I think, is far overstated. France will never become an English speaking country. Neither will Thailand, Russia, China or any other country that isn't English speaking already. Indeed, I can't think of a single instance, absent conquest, where some language overran another nationalized language.

So, English may yet kill all the other languages in the UK, Australia, the US and other places where it's the main language; all the other minority languages in the world may be wiped out by the dominant languages in their country; we may face the sad fate of being left with only a few languages per country, i.e., several hundred.  But so long as countries exist, the English language won't encroach further even though American culture might.

While the idea of language death is starting to get more publicity, it's  important to know what it really means. It's not about English computer terms ruining the purity of French or too much gosh darned loud American rock and roll. It's about the disappearance of minority languages around the globe.

Thank you for stopping by. Please share the article if you think it deserves and don't forget to subscribe by email to get our latest articles. Have a blessed day. We meet in my next article. 


  1. „Russian <...> attempted to kill many of the Turkic languages, like Uzbek and Kazakh, and Caucasian language like Georgian“. That does not look like a very accurate statement. The Soviet state established (ethnic in fact) republics, the languages had state sponsored teaching, press, TV (can't think of any other nation doing something similar) — in some cases things got worse after the fall of the Union, and surely there were no deliberate policy to kill any republic-level language in the USSR (as for smaller ones, not all of them were equally lucky indeed, some faced policies that could make the language shift process faster indeed).


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What can you do with a degree in linguistics?

When you tell someone that you are a linguist, they respond in: how many languages do you speak?  People so often assume that a linguist's job is to learn as much languages as possible, when in actuality it is not anything near that. So, let us put an end to this erroneous assumption once and for all. 
Linguists do not engage in learning languages, linguists engage in studying how language works. And when I say language, I mean human language, an umbrella term that subsumes all languages spoken by humans, including pidgins, creoles, and sign languages. Thanks to linguists the world is a better place now, many daunting problems that existed for centuries have been solved because now we have a better understanding of language and language-related issues. in this article, you will see, in full-length, the contributions of linguists to the modern world. And you are going to see that it's a disgrace to confine a linguist's job to just learning languages. 
Let me just give you …

What linguists know that other people don't.

Being a linguist, or an advanced student of linguistics, is a privilege in a lot of respects. As you analyze language and everyday speech you start to realize that there is an astonishing amount of wonder in this system that we take for granted. Linguists question the obvious, which is language, and got answers that forever changed mankind’s understanding of Language and human nature. They also made us aware of many issues related to language and the attitudes we hold towards them. In this article, you will see what linguists know that is not so evident to, or not accepted by, other people. So let's see what we've got. We all speak one language. One of the main discoveries of modern linguistics is that it made us aware that all the languages we speak are similar in astonishing respects; they manifest the same pattern, follow the same rules, they are learnt in exactly the same way, and that all the differences are only superficial. So, in a sense we all speak the same language.…

8 books everyone into linguistics should read.

When you want to decide on what to read in language and linguistics, it is never easy to pick a reading list; there is just so many books out there under the label of linguistics, especially that publications in linguistics have been growing like wild fire in the last couple of decades. So with your limited time and the unlimited number of books, it is always wise to make some research beforehand on what exactly you want to read. There is a lot to choose from, and the best book will depend on what you are specifically interested in. This is why we, at The Language Nerds, compiled a list of linguistics books that will entertain the novice and the expert alike. Here are some places to start: 
1.The Language Instinct by Steven Pinker

This is a book for the general science readers, it is very accessible whether you have a background in linguistics or not. It is considered by many as a landmark in linguistics. It is a great introduction and primer to some of the more basic problems and que…